European Philanthropic Behavior Patterns: Charitable Giving, Non-Profit and Welfare Regimes in the European Union

Adela Lazar, Adrian Hatos

Abstract


The connection that links patterns of phil­anthropic behavior with the organization of state delivery of welfare and the development of civil society has been theorized recently. Off this line of thought we refer to the Esping-Andersen’s well-known welfare regimes: Liberal, Conserva­tive and Social-Democratic (1990), respectively, more recently, to the philanthropic regimes elab­orated by Pennerstorfer and Neumeyr (2017): Liberal, Social-Democratic, Corporatist, Mediter­ranean and Eastern European regimes. In order to test the taxonomy of the non-profit regimes de­veloped by the aforementioned authors, we em­ployed the more recent data of the 2010 74.1 Eu­robarometer. In our approach we classified the 29 countries and territories using the hierarchical clustering technique and identified three main classes of countries, named by us, regimes of philanthropic practices: Regime 1 (Great Givers), Regime 2 (Direct Givers) and Regime 3 (NGO Donors and Volunteers). A comparison of our classification with the one proposed by Penner­storfer and Neumeyr shows similarities as well as the limits of the original taxonomy which can be partly overcome due to the larger and more vari­ate pool of cases. Interpretations of the results in comparison with Esping’s welfare regimes or to the alternative models of Crowding-out and Crowding-in of NGOs by state are also provided.


Keywords


welfare regimes; philanthropy; charity; non-profit regimes; philanthropic behavior.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2019.2 Creative Commons License
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences by TRAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://rtsa.ro/tras/


Online ISSN: 2247-8310 | Print ISSN: 1842-2845 |  © AMP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.